To some, it would seem that I’m skipping more than a few premises, but consider this: if scientists were to emerge from their experimental stations and declare to the entire world, “We have conclusively proved that it does seem that there is, in fact, a supernatural deity behind our realm,” does it really prove the Christian right? Does it not require a leap of faith to declare that, not only is there a deity, but that your god is the true one? Is it not arrogant to say that your god is above all those that preceded him? Are you not as much of an unbeliever in these gods as the Deist is to yours? I would say that you would have merely proven the Deist to be the more likely victor- for he believes in a creator god, but not a personal and intercessory one. The deity of Deism does not subject himself to human intervention and favoritism, but merely created and observed his creation or moved on to tasks more deserving of such a powerful and transcending force. Indeed, not only does the Christian face the 2,800+ gods of recorded human history, but also those we have not come up with, and even ones we cannot remotely fathom!
So, whenever a theist comes up to me and asks me, “What do you think; what would you say; what might you do if you’re wrong?” I’d happily respond, “I might not respond any worse than you if you find out you were wrong about Krishna and Shiva; Ra and Anubis; Zeus and Apollo; Jupiter and Saturn; or even, Wotan and Thor.”
I have to agree that there is no remotely possible way of declaring that one god is better or superior to any other(s). It is more more likely that if there is a god it would be more concerned with bigger and more pressing matters rather than focusing on each individual being and their issues.
Nice question I always ask my self that,because you need to put that in perspective, you never know when you are wrong